Floor Refinishing in San Francisco

San Francisco Conditions That Affect Floor Refinishing

NOAA's Comparative Climatic Data humidity table lists San Francisco (station 23272, period of record 1945-2018) at a mean July relative humidity of 91% in the morning and 71% in the afternoon, with annual means of 87% and 69%. The same table gives Sacramento a July afternoon mean of 29% and Stockton 27%. San Francisco's morning-to-afternoon spread of about 20 points is among the narrowest in the table; Sacramento's is roughly 42. San Francisco summers near 67°F change the finishing schedule more than the sanding. Waterborne finishes flash off faster in hot, dry air, which shortens the working window and makes lap marks easier to leave behind; we adjust application pace and airflow to the conditions in the house that day rather than to a fixed timetable.

NOAA 1991-2020 normals at San Francisco Downtown give a January average high of 57.8°F and an average low of 46.6°F. Winter lows sit well above freezing. Annual precipitation normal is 22.9 inches, of which 4.40 inches falls in January alone. Cold, damp conditions do the reverse and stretch cure times, which mostly costs patience — a floor that is walkable is not yet a floor that is ready for furniture or rugs.

The marine layer holds summer temperatures far below the inland valleys. The July normal high at San Francisco Downtown is 66.3°F and August is 67.9°F — roughly 14°F cooler than Redwood City, 25 miles south on the same peninsula, which normals at 81.0°F in July. Marine air around San Francisco lengthens finish cure times relative to a hot inland day — a scheduling factor rather than a quality one.

What's Under the Finish

California's Earthquake Brace + Bolt program, administered by the California Residential Mitigation Program, states that 'an EBB seismic retrofit is only done on wood-framed, pre-1980 homes with a raised foundation,' targeting cripple walls in crawl spaces beneath the structure. Twenty-eight San Francisco ZIP codes appear on the 2025 EBB Northern California eligibility list, from 94102 through 94158 — the largest block of any city in this service area. That establishes that pre-1980 raised-foundation houses exist here in numbers the state considers worth a grant program. It does not establish a share: EBB eligibility is set at the ZIP level and no source publishes a measured raised-versus-slab split for San Francisco. Alongside this, 76.5% of the city's 414,602 housing units predate 1980 and 45.2% predate 1940 per ACS. Separately, San Francisco's mandatory soft-story retrofit ordinance applies to wood-frame buildings of five or more residential units built before 1978 — that ordinance is evidence about multi-unit buildings, not about single-family foundation type, and is not used here as a proxy for one.

Raised floors are where the best refinishing candidates live: solid wood over a crawlspace, often with decades of wear and plenty of thickness left. It is also where cupping comes from. Sanding a cupped floor flat before the crawlspace moisture is fixed produces a floor that goes concave the other way once it dries — so the moisture reading comes first and the sanding comes second.

Source: NAHB analysis of the Census Bureau Survey of Construction, foundation type by region (2024)

San Francisco Homes We Work In

ACS 2020-2024 five-year estimates count 414,602 housing units, of which 45.2% (187,447 units) were built in 1939 or earlier. That is the single largest pre-1940 concentration in this service area by a wide margin. A further 8.4% date to 1940-1949 and 7.7% to the 1950s; construction from 2000 onward accounts for 14.4% of the stock. San Francisco's pre-1940, 1940s, and 1960s stock is where refinishing pays off most: homes of that period often have original wood under carpet, and when the wear layer is intact, refinishing keeps a floor that cannot be bought new. We check thickness at a vent or a doorway before recommending it.